David Graham
Anyone who thought that Donald Trump would take a conciliatory tack in the first Republican debate was quickly disillusioned. Chris Wallace, one of the Fox News moderators, asked if any candidate was unwilling to pledge to support the eventual GOP nominee. And Trump, offering his best, most dramatic shrug, happily refused to take the pledge.
That set the
tone for the rest of the night: First, the moderators weren’t going to
pull any punches. Throughout the evening, they probed the candidates’
greatest perceived weaknesses. And second, Trump had no intention of
abandoning the act that’s carried him from perennial joke to the top of
the Republican presidential nomination.
It
was a debate marked by conversations about immigration, abortion, and
foreign policy—especially about Iran. The discussion of race relations,
the biggest news story of the last year, was notably sparse. It took
more than 90 minutes until a candidate received a #BlackLivesMatter
question, and when it came, the candidates opted to tread lightly,
avoiding unforced errors.
Recommended: Who Won the Republican Presidential Debate?
The
evening also lacked many direct battles between the candidates. That
was partly a factor of the format, but when asked to critique or speak
directly to an onstage rival, the hopefuls often demurred.
That
made the two big battles of the night all the more notable. In the
first, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and Kentucky Senator Rand Paul
battled over terrorism and civil liberties, with Christie accusing the
senator of failing to understand the threat to the nation—and Paul
tartly responding that Christie failed to understand the Bill of Rights.
Later, Christie tangled with former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee,
who as presented himself as a defender of entitlements for workers and
seniors.
And there was Trump, of course. He was, inevitably, one
of the standouts of the night. Although he mostly avoided taking direct
shots at his opponents, he couldn’t resist battling the moderators. They
hardly relented, asking him about boorish comments about women; his
slurs against Mexican immigrants; his previous Democratic allegiance;
his past description of himself as pro-choice; and his donations to
Hillary Clinton.Recommended: The Bureaucrats Who Singled Out Hiroshima for Destruction
Trump
repeatedly took issue with questions and interrupted the hosts, and
what he lacked in coherence or detail, he made up for in bluster and
grievance. Some of the questions seemed to play directly into his hands.
Whether the night was good or bad for Trump remains to be seen—I’ve
learned better in recent weeks than to try to predict whether the
real-estate mogul’s comments will redound to his benefit or
disadvantage.
But it’s interesting to watch Trump turn his weaknesses into strengths, which he does with an ease that eludes some long-time politicians. And he has plenty of weaknesses. He seems to be betting that his clear anger can, well, trump all of those flaws. Asked about donating to Clinton, for example, Trump delivered what amounted to a rousing defense of crony capitalism, saying that as a businessman he did what he had to. Later, asked about his companies declaring bankruptcy, he insisted he was just shrewdly taking advantage of the system.
Recommended: Was It Right?
He seems to be saying to the disaffected everyman Republican who’s angry at Washington and angry at his leaders: Yes,
you’re right. The system is rigged. Would you rather elect a guy who’s
part of that, or a guy who sits outside it and is shrewd enough to get
rich from it? The hope is that they’ll respect his hustle and his
ability to take advantage of that rigging, rather than viewing him as an
elite charlatan.
Among the
other candidates, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush was able to make a
strong impression and get lots of camera time but he also faced several
difficult questions from the moderators, and he didn’t always have ready
answers. Despite being asked repeatedly about the war in Iraq, Bush
still doesn’t have a punchy and persuasive response (a problem he shares
with Hillary Clinton). He also stumbled in replying to questions about
his membership on the board of Bloomberg Philanthropies and about the Common Core.
Florida
Senator Marco Rubio gave one of the best performances of the night,
showing why so many commentators remain bullish on his prospects despite
his middling poll numbers. Rubio delivered strong and detailed answers,
appearing poised and in command of his material. His best line of the
night came early on, when he noted that he’d only recently paid off his
student loans and asked, “How is Hillary Clinton going to lecture me about living paycheck to paycheck?”
Yet
perhaps the most surprising showing came from Chris Christie. His
presidential campaign has widely been viewed as past its expiration
date. But he was able to capitalize on his everyman persona Thursday
night—speaking in detail, delivering his responses with passion, and
picking his fights without letting his temper get the better of him.
Not
everyone had such a strong night. Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has
consistently run alongside Bush and Trump atop polls, but his answers on
Thursday night were forgettable. In his closing statement,
he promised he was “aggressively normal,” but Walker’s problem in
Cleveland was that the “aggressive” hardly came through. That’s not the
worst-possible scenario for him: He avoided committing a serious gaffe,
despite repeated questions that seemed aimed at testing his knowledge of
foreign policy, and his strong showing to this point means this debate
is unlikely to prove decisive for his prospects.
Ben
Carson, a first-time debater and candidate, seemed listless and
low-energy, and while he faithfully repeated the culture-war mantras
that have won him fans, he didn’t have direct answers to almost any of
the questions he fielded. (Carson did score some late points with a
couple of funny jokes about brain removal in his closing statements.)
Rand Paul also seemed a bit lost on stage. At his best, Paul is able to
use the rest of the field as his foil, but on Thursday, he
fumbled questions about Iran and foreign aid to Israel, passing up
opportunities to land punches on his rivals. Beset by campaign scandal
and fundraising struggles, Paul needed a strong performance, and he
failed to produce one.
Texas
Senator Ted Cruz and Huckabee, meanwhile, made up the middle of the pack
and presented an interesting contrast. Both are charismatic figures
vying for the social conservative vote. Cruz stuck mostly to his tried
and true lines, and boasted of the long list of legislation that he has
proposed in the Senate (without emphasizing the fact that none of it has
become law). Huckabee, meanwhile, threw red meat to religious
conservatives while playing up a populist case for entitlements.
The
biggest question mark of the night is John Kasich. The Ohio governor
was the last man to make it onto the stage, polling lowest among the 10
candidates who made the cut. At times, he seemed in command, but he
also didn’t have a good answer to a question about accepting Medicaid
expansion under Obamacare. Was his performance enough to make it to the
next stage, or will a standout from the “kids’ table” debate earlier—perhaps consensus champion Carly Fiorina—take his spot? —David Graham
No comments:
Post a Comment